vndb/mithril-vndb
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fix grammar

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Kelly Thomas Kline 2017-03-25 11:44:59 -07:00 • committed by GitHub
parent f1b66745af
commit fe5f92eb2e
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/framework-comparison.md
View file

@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ React | Mithril
Library load times matter in applications that don't stay open for long periods of time (for example, anything in mobile) and cannot be improved via caching or other optimization techniques.
Since this is a micro-benchmark, you are encourage to replicate these tests yourself since hardware can heavily affect the numbers. Note that bundler frameworks like Webpack can move dependencies out before the timer calls to emulate static module resolution, so you should either copy the code from the compiled CDN files or open the output file from the bundler library, and manually add the high resolution timer calls `console.time` and `console.timeEnd` to the bundled script. Avoid using `new Date` and `performance.now`, as those mechanisms are not as statistically accurate.
Since this is a micro-benchmark, you are encouraged to replicate these tests yourself since hardware can heavily affect the numbers. Note that bundler frameworks like Webpack can move dependencies out before the timer calls to emulate static module resolution, so you should either copy the code from the compiled CDN files or open the output file from the bundler library, and manually add the high resolution timer calls `console.time` and `console.timeEnd` to the bundled script. Avoid using `new Date` and `performance.now`, as those mechanisms are not as statistically accurate.
For your reading convenience, here's a version of that benchmark adapted to use CDNs on the web: the [benchmark for React is here](https://jsfiddle.net/0ovkv64u/), and the [benchmark for Mithril is here](https://jsfiddle.net/o7hxooqL/). Note that we're benchmarking all of Mithril rather than benchmarking only the rendering module (which would be equivalent in scope to React). Also note that this CDN-driven setup incurs some overheads due to fetching resources from disk cache (~2ms per resource). Due to those reasons, the numbers here are not entirely accurate, but they should be sufficient to observe that Mithril's initialization speed is noticeably better than React.