yhdev/dat/doc/vndbtitles.md
2023-02-12 08:46:42 +01:00

617 lines
38 KiB
Markdown

% Overengineering Title Preferences for VNDB
(Published on **2022-12-23**)
Alternative title: Fighting with the PostgreSQL query planner.
What people want me to work on: cool new features and user interface updates
for [VNDB](https://vndb.org/).<br>
What I actually work on: rewriting existing features and silly microbenchmarks.
In this post I elaborate on the technical implementation of one particular site
feature and my attempts to improve on it.
# Context: Title Preferences
The VNDB schema has these two tables:
```sql
CREATE TABLE vn (
id vndbid PRIMARY KEY,
olang language NOT NULL, -- "original language"
-- and more
);
CREATE TABLE vn_titles (
id vndbid NOT NULL, -- refers to vn.id
lang language NOT NULL,
official boolean NOT NULL,
title text NOT NULL,
latin text,
PRIMARY KEY(id, lang)
);
```
That is to say, we've got visual novel (`vn`) entries, and each entry can have
a bunch of titles, one for each language it has been published in. The
`vn.olang` column tells us which language the VN has originally been published
in and hence which title to consider as primary. Titles can be unofficial and
titles written in a non-latin script (CJK, Cyrillic, etc) also have a
transcription to the latin alphabet.
When a VN entry is displayed on the website, the `latin` title of the original
language (or just the `title` if `latin` is NULL) is used as the main title,
and, when applicable, the `title` in the original script is used as an
alternative title. The alternative title is often displayed below the main
title or used as HTML "title" attribute in listings and links. To take
[G-senjou no Maou](https://vndb.org/v211) as an example:
![Annotated screenshot of the VNDB G-senjou no Maou page](/img/vndbtitles.jpg)
People who can read Japanese will generally not care for that latin
transcription, while other people may prefer to see an English title when one
is available. Hence, [VNDB lets users configure which titles to
display](https://vndb.org/t17804). These settings are pretty flexible: users
can list multiple languages, assign a priority to each and indicate whether to
accept only original or official titles. The selection algorithm for the main
and alternative titles can be configured separately. Here's an [elaborate
example](/img/vndbtitleprefs.png).
# More Context: Current Implementation
To ease the migration from the old situation where a VN entry only had a single
title, I implemented this feature in SQL by (ab)using VIEWs.
The database schema now has the following view, which acts as an alias to the
`vn` table and adds a `title` and `alttitle` column:
```sql
CREATE VIEW vnt AS
SELECT v.*
, COALESCE(vo.latin, vo.title) AS title
, CASE WHEN vo.latin IS NULL THEN '' ELSE vo.title END AS alttitle
FROM vn v
JOIN vn_titles vo ON vo.id = v.id AND vo.lang = v.olang;
```
Adjusting the code to select from this view instead of the `vn` table was
trivial and the performance is perfectly fine. With that view in place, there's
a simple path towards supporting title preferences: just temporarily replace
that view with a different query that implements the user's preferred title
selection. This is made even easier because, in PostgreSQL, temporary views are
defined inside a special session-local schema and that schema is searched
before the others. So all that is needed to switch to a configuration where
English is preferred for the main title is the following query^[Sadly, while
the "CREATE TABLE" syntax supports an "ON COMMIT DROP" clause to get rid of the
table after the transaction has completed, this feature is not available for
views, so the view needs to be dropped or replaced manually to switch back to
the default configuration.].
```sql
CREATE OR REPLACE TEMPORARY VIEW vnt AS
SELECT v.*
, COALESCE(ve.title, vo.latin, vo.title) AS title
, CASE WHEN vo.latin IS NULL THEN '' ELSE vo.title END AS alttitle
FROM vn v
JOIN vn_titles vo ON vo.id = v.id AND vo.lang = v.olang
LEFT JOIN vn_titles ve ON ve.id = v.id AND ve.lang = 'en';
```
While abusing views for configuration is perhaps a bit weird, this particular
solution was motivated by two other constraints:
**"If you're generating the SQL from the application anyway, couldn't you
inline the preferences as a subquery rather than using a view?"** That would be
a nicer solution, but there's a problem. I also have this `item_info()` support
function that takes an identifier of any database object - including VNs - and
returns some generic information about that object - including the title. That
title should also take preferences into account, so I either need to have a way
to pass the preferences as a function argument or... simply have it select from
a `VIEW`. The `item_info()` function is also too useful to just let go.
**"How about just passing all available titles to the application and implement
the preferences there?"** Would not be a terrible solution either, except that
I also need a way to sort large-ish lists on the displayed title. I'd rather
not do that in the application as performance would be a nightmare.
That is not to say the current abuse of views is necessarily a *great* solution
either, it comes with two main drawbacks:
- The `CREATE VIEW` command isn't super slow, but also not instant. It has to
be run at the start of each pageview (when switching from a previous
configuration, at least), and we'll need to issue a command for each database
type that supports title preferences. Currently that's only two (VNs and
releases), but I'd like to increase that number and that will further
increase page generation times even for pages that don't display any titles
at all.
- There are some scenarios where we need to query an object title (through
`item_info()` or other means) *without* applying the user's preferences, but
switching preferences for each query is much too slow. My current workaround
is to remove the temporary schema from the `search_path` so that the
temporary view is not visible to the query being run, but that's a pretty
shitty hack.
# A Little Experiment
In search for a better solution, I was wondering if I could implement the title
selection *entirely* within SQL. That is, in such a way that the users'
preferences are passed around as some value and that the query to fetch the
correct title is then generated within SQL. PostgreSQL supports writing
functions that can be used in the context of a table or view, and I knew it
could, if stars aligned correctly, also optimize queries through function
boundaries. My initial attempt to write such a function looked like this:
```sql
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vnt(p langprefs) RETURNS SETOF vnt_type AS $$
SELECT v.*
, coalesce(
CASE WHEN p.t1_latin THEN t1.latin ELSE NULL END, t1.title,
CASE WHEN p.t2_latin THEN t2.latin ELSE NULL END, t2.title,
CASE WHEN p.t3_latin THEN t3.latin ELSE NULL END, t3.title,
CASE WHEN p.t4_latin THEN t4.latin ELSE NULL END, t4.title,
CASE WHEN p.t5_latin THEN t5.latin ELSE NULL END, t5.title
) AS title
, coalesce(
CASE WHEN p.a1_latin THEN a1.latin ELSE NULL END, a1.title,
CASE WHEN p.a2_latin THEN a2.latin ELSE NULL END, a2.title,
CASE WHEN p.a3_latin THEN a3.latin ELSE NULL END, a3.title,
CASE WHEN p.a4_latin THEN a4.latin ELSE NULL END, a4.title,
CASE WHEN p.a5_latin THEN a5.latin ELSE NULL END, a5.title
) AS alttitle
FROM vn v
LEFT JOIN vn_titles t1 ON t1.id = v.id AND t1.lang = COALESCE(p.t1_lang, v.olang) AND (NOT p.t1_official OR t1.official)
LEFT JOIN vn_titles t2 ON t2.id = v.id AND t2.lang = COALESCE(p.t2_lang, v.olang) AND (NOT p.t2_official OR t2.official) AND p.t1_lang IS NOT NULL
LEFT JOIN vn_titles t3 ON t3.id = v.id AND t3.lang = COALESCE(p.t3_lang, v.olang) AND (NOT p.t3_official OR t3.official) AND p.t1_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.t2_lang IS NOT NULL
LEFT JOIN vn_titles t4 ON t4.id = v.id AND t4.lang = COALESCE(p.t4_lang, v.olang) AND (NOT p.t4_official OR t4.official) AND p.t1_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.t2_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.t3_lang IS NOT NULL
LEFT JOIN vn_titles t5 ON t5.id = v.id AND t5.lang = COALESCE(p.t5_lang, v.olang) AND (NOT p.t5_official OR t5.official) AND p.t1_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.t2_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.t3_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.t4_lang IS NOT NULL
LEFT JOIN vn_titles a1 ON a1.id = v.id AND a1.lang = COALESCE(p.a1_lang, v.olang) AND (NOT p.a1_official OR a1.official)
LEFT JOIN vn_titles a2 ON a2.id = v.id AND a2.lang = COALESCE(p.a2_lang, v.olang) AND (NOT p.a2_official OR a2.official) AND p.a1_lang IS NOT NULL
LEFT JOIN vn_titles a3 ON a3.id = v.id AND a3.lang = COALESCE(p.a3_lang, v.olang) AND (NOT p.a3_official OR a3.official) AND p.a1_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.a2_lang IS NOT NULL
LEFT JOIN vn_titles a4 ON a4.id = v.id AND a4.lang = COALESCE(p.a4_lang, v.olang) AND (NOT p.a4_official OR a4.official) AND p.a1_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.a2_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.a3_lang IS NOT NULL
LEFT JOIN vn_titles a5 ON a5.id = v.id AND a5.lang = COALESCE(p.a5_lang, v.olang) AND (NOT p.a5_official OR a5.official) AND p.a1_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.a2_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.a3_lang IS NOT NULL AND p.a4_lang IS NOT NULL
$$ LANGUAGE SQL STABLE;
```
Not the most elegant function ever written and also not fully correct, but it
serves as a starting point. It can be used in place of the `vnt` view:
```sql
SELECT id, title, alttitle
FROM vnt('(en,,,,,,,,,,t,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f)'::langprefs) x
WHERE NOT hidden AND id < 'v10';
```
The configuration I'm using here is the same as the English-main-title example
used above. To my surprise, the corresponding query plan isn't even awful:
```
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop Left Join (cost=655.67..4101.26 rows=195 width=68) (actual time=0.053..3.255 rows=9 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=655.67..4099.31 rows=195 width=315) (actual time=0.052..3.252 rows=9 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=655.67..4097.36 rows=195 width=284) (actual time=0.052..3.250 rows=9 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=655.67..4095.41 rows=195 width=253) (actual time=0.052..3.249 rows=9 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=655.67..4093.46 rows=195 width=222) (actual time=0.052..3.247 rows=9 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=655.38..2933.01 rows=195 width=195) (actual time=0.049..3.236 rows=9 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=655.38..2931.06 rows=195 width=164) (actual time=0.049..3.235 rows=9 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=655.38..2929.11 rows=195 width=133) (actual time=0.048..3.233 rows=9 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=655.38..2927.16 rows=195 width=102) (actual time=0.048..3.231 rows=9 loops=1)
-> Hash Right Join (cost=655.09..1766.71 rows=195 width=71) (actual time=0.042..3.215 rows=9 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (t1.id = v.id)
-> Seq Scan on vn_titles t1 (cost=0.00..1081.40 rows=11514 width=67) (actual time=0.002..2.689 rows=11535 loops=1)
Filter: (lang = 'en'::language)
Rows Removed by Filter: 33617
-> Hash (cost=652.65..652.65 rows=195 width=8) (actual time=0.018..0.019 rows=9 loops=1)
Buckets: 1024 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 9kB
-> Bitmap Heap Scan on vn v (cost=5.86..652.65 rows=195 width=8) (actual time=0.008..0.016 rows=9 loops=1)
Recheck Cond: (id < 'v10'::vndbid)
Filter: (NOT hidden)
Heap Blocks: exact=9
-> Bitmap Index Scan on vn_pkey (cost=0.00..5.81 rows=203 width=0) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=9 loops=1)
Index Cond: (id < 'v10'::vndbid)
-> Index Scan using vn_titles_pkey on vn_titles t2 (cost=0.29..5.95 rows=1 width=39) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=1 loops=9)
Index Cond: ((id = v.id) AND (lang = COALESCE(v.olang)))
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=9)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=9)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=9)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Index Scan using vn_titles_pkey on vn_titles a1 (cost=0.29..5.95 rows=1 width=39) (actual time=0.001..0.001 rows=1 loops=9)
Index Cond: ((id = v.id) AND (lang = COALESCE(v.olang)))
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=9)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=9)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=9)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=9)
One-Time Filter: false
Planning Time: 1.558 ms
Execution Time: 3.329 ms
```
I mean, it's neither the smallest nor the best^[The planner made a bad estimate
about the number of rows returned by the "`id < 'v10'`" filter and ended up
choosing a sequential scan on `vn_titles` when a few index lookups would
probably have been faster, but that's not important for now.] plan, but:
- The big ugly query inside the `vnt()` function was properly "inlined" into
the `SELECT` statement where it was used, which allowed the query planner to
move the conditions from the `WHERE` clause to the point where rows from the
`vn` table are being read, which in turn allows it to use an index. Without
this optimization, that simple query would have had to read all titles from
all VN entries from disk, only to then throw almost everything away again.
- There's a lot of joins, but the planner had correctly inferred that they'll
never match anything and has optimized those out with a "One-Time Filter:
false".
Honestly, that's pretty awesome. Let's try sorting on the title.
```sql
SELECT id, title, alttitle
FROM vnt('(en,,,,,,,,,,t,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f)'::langprefs) x
WHERE NOT hidden
ORDER BY title LIMIT 100
```
```
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=13010.96..13011.21 rows=100 width=68) (actual time=108.074..108.085 rows=100 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=13010.96..13108.95 rows=39196 width=68) (actual time=108.073..108.079 rows=100 loops=1)
Sort Key: (COALESCE(t1.latin, t1.title, t2.title, title, title, title))
Sort Method: top-N heapsort Memory: 44kB
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=4516.79..11512.92 rows=39196 width=68) (actual time=19.879..88.257 rows=39128 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=4516.79..11120.96 rows=39196 width=315) (actual time=19.878..82.548 rows=39128 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=4516.79..10729.00 rows=39196 width=284) (actual time=19.878..77.113 rows=39128 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=4516.79..10337.04 rows=39196 width=253) (actual time=19.877..71.686 rows=39128 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Hash Left Join (cost=4516.79..9945.08 rows=39196 width=222) (actual time=19.877..66.404 rows=39128 loops=1)
Hash Cond: ((v.id = a1.id) AND (COALESCE(v.olang) = a1.lang))
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=2870.99..8093.50 rows=39196 width=195) (actual time=11.921..50.437 rows=39128 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=2870.99..7701.54 rows=39196 width=164) (actual time=11.920..45.003 rows=39128 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=2870.99..7309.58 rows=39196 width=133) (actual time=11.920..39.607 rows=39128 loops=1)
Join Filter: false
-> Hash Left Join (cost=2870.99..6917.62 rows=39196 width=102) (actual time=11.919..33.959 rows=39128 loops=1)
Hash Cond: ((v.id = t2.id) AND (COALESCE(v.olang) = t2.lang))
-> Hash Left Join (cost=1225.19..5066.04 rows=39196 width=71) (actual time=3.964..18.276 rows=39128 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (v.id = t1.id)
-> Seq Scan on vn v (cost=0.00..3737.95 rows=39196 width=8) (actual time=0.003..9.290 rows=39128 loops=1)
Filter: (NOT hidden)
Rows Removed by Filter: 1667
-> Hash (cost=1081.40..1081.40 rows=11503 width=67) (actual time=3.958..3.958 rows=11535 loops=1)
Buckets: 16384 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 783kB
-> Seq Scan on vn_titles t1 (cost=0.00..1081.40 rows=11503 width=67) (actual time=0.002..2.924 rows=11535 loops=1)
Filter: (lang = 'en'::language)
Rows Removed by Filter: 33617
-> Hash (cost=968.52..968.52 rows=45152 width=39) (actual time=7.933..7.934 rows=45152 loops=1)
Buckets: 65536 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 3749kB
-> Seq Scan on vn_titles t2 (cost=0.00..968.52 rows=45152 width=39) (actual time=0.001..3.368 rows=45152 loops=1)
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=39128)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=39128)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=39128)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Hash (cost=968.52..968.52 rows=45152 width=39) (actual time=7.933..7.933 rows=45152 loops=1)
Buckets: 65536 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 3749kB
-> Seq Scan on vn_titles a1 (cost=0.00..968.52 rows=45152 width=39) (actual time=0.001..3.385 rows=45152 loops=1)
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=39128)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=39128)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=39128)
One-Time Filter: false
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=31) (actual time=0.000..0.000 rows=0 loops=39128)
One-Time Filter: false
Planning Time: 0.768 ms
Execution Time: 108.133 ms
```
Hmm, wait, all those joins that I had thought the planner had nicely optimized
away apparently still take up 5ms+ of processing time each. That's... not
ideal. Let's look at the `vnt` view solution for comparison:
```
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=8415.66..8415.91 rows=100 width=68) (actual time=37.743..37.752 rows=100 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=8415.66..8513.65 rows=39196 width=68) (actual time=37.742..37.746 rows=100 loops=1)
Sort Key: (COALESCE(ve.title, vo.latin, vo.title))
Sort Method: top-N heapsort Memory: 42kB
-> Hash Join (cost=2870.99..6917.62 rows=39196 width=68) (actual time=12.355..31.546 rows=39128 loops=1)
Hash Cond: ((v.id = vo.id) AND (v.olang = vo.lang))
-> Hash Left Join (cost=1225.19..5066.04 rows=39196 width=39) (actual time=3.694..16.147 rows=39128 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (v.id = ve.id)
-> Seq Scan on vn v (cost=0.00..3737.95 rows=39196 width=8) (actual time=0.002..8.232 rows=39128 loops=1)
Filter: (NOT hidden)
Rows Removed by Filter: 1667
-> Hash (cost=1081.40..1081.40 rows=11503 width=35) (actual time=3.685..3.686 rows=11535 loops=1)
Buckets: 16384 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 782kB
-> Seq Scan on vn_titles ve (cost=0.00..1081.40 rows=11503 width=35) (actual time=0.001..2.598 rows=11535 loops=1)
Filter: (lang = 'en'::language)
Rows Removed by Filter: 33617
-> Hash (cost=968.52..968.52 rows=45152 width=71) (actual time=8.652..8.652 rows=45152 loops=1)
Buckets: 65536 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 4665kB
-> Seq Scan on vn_titles vo (cost=0.00..968.52 rows=45152 width=71) (actual time=0.003..3.676 rows=45152 loops=1)
Planning Time: 0.217 ms
Execution Time: 37.778 ms
```
Ouch, much faster. One reason it's faster is because there's only a single join
to fetch the title for the original language, rather than two in the `vnt()`
function. That can be worked around by special-casing a join on the original
language, but the other reason it's faster is that all those silly unused joins
don't exist at all, and I hadn't a clue how to fix that.
([Full script](/download/code/vntitles1.sql) of this experiment for those who
want to follow along, it should work on the [public database
dumps](https://vndb.org/d14#5) with minimal modifications)
# A Little Detour: Custom Aggregate
So my mind wandered off to try another approach. What if we simply fetch all
the relevant titles for the VN entry and throw them through a custom aggregate
function that selects the appropriate title? So I gave that a try:
```sql
CREATE TYPE vntitle_state AS (
rank smallint,
title text
);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vntitle_sfunc(state vntitle_state, t vn_titles, olang language, p langprefs) RETURNS vntitle_state AS $$
BEGIN
IF state.rank > 1 AND COALESCE(p.t1_lang, olang) = t.lang AND (NOT p.t1_official OR t.official) THEN
RETURN ROW(1::smallint, COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.t1_latin THEN t.latin ELSE NULL END, t.title));
ELSIF state.rank > 2 AND COALESCE(p.t2_lang, olang) = t.lang AND (NOT p.t2_official OR t.official) THEN
RETURN ROW(2::smallint, COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.t2_latin THEN t.latin ELSE NULL END, t.title));
ELSIF state.rank > 3 AND COALESCE(p.t3_lang, olang) = t.lang AND (NOT p.t3_official OR t.official) THEN
RETURN ROW(3::smallint, COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.t3_latin THEN t.latin ELSE NULL END, t.title));
ELSIF state.rank > 4 AND COALESCE(p.t4_lang, olang) = t.lang AND (NOT p.t4_official OR t.official) THEN
RETURN ROW(4::smallint, COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.t4_latin THEN t.latin ELSE NULL END, t.title));
ELSIF state.rank > 5 AND COALESCE(p.t5_lang, olang) = t.lang AND (NOT p.t5_official OR t.official) THEN
RETURN ROW(5::smallint, COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.t5_latin THEN t.latin ELSE NULL END, t.title));
END IF;
RETURN state;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql IMMUTABLE;
CREATE OR REPLACE AGGREGATE vntitle(vn_titles, language, langprefs) (
SFUNC = vntitle_sfunc,
STYPE = vntitle_state,
INITCOND = '(6,)'
);
```
Requires rewriting our SELECT query a bit, but it's still usable:
```sql
SELECT v.id, vntitle(t, v.olang, '(en,,,,,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f,f)'::langprefs) title
FROM vn v
JOIN vn_titles t ON t.id = v.id
WHERE NOT hidden AND v.id < 'v10'
GROUP BY v.id;
```
Uh, that simple example already takes 10ms, making it slower than the `vnt()`
approach. It's even worse if we want to sort on the title: 114ms. I replaced my
custom aggregate with the built-in `max()` to see if it was just my custom
function being slow, but even then we're at 4.2ms and 52ms, both slower than
the original `vnt` view.
Nope, bad idea (but I kept the [full script](/download/code/vntitles2.sql)
anyway).
# Another Little Detour: SupportRequestSimplify
One of the neat things about PostgreSQL is that it exposes much of its internal
workings through a C extension API. If you're running into the limitations of
SQL, there's always the option of dropping into C. The C API exposes [a planner
support function](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/xfunc-optimization.html),
which, among other things, has a "`SupportRequestSimplify`" operation that lets
you rewrite a function call into an arbitrary SQL expression tree at planning
time.
So what I could do, I thought, is write a C support function that rewrites
calls to `vnt()` with the appropriate optimized SQL statements; thus not
emitting any unnecessary JOINs in the first place.
I did write a little function to verify that the `SupportRequestSimplify`
operation is being called for functions in table context - it is - and I looked
into having it generate and return a proper table expression, but browsing
through the PostgreSQL source code I could not find a single instance of the
simplify operation being used in such a way. It only seems to be used (and
intended) for simplifying certain types of scalar expressions, so I'm not sure
to what extend it's possible to have it construct complex SQL statements.
Before I was able to dig deeper and really give it a try, I came to my senses
and realized that I don't want to write and maintain complex C code generating
custom query trees for each type of database object. I haven't gone quite that
mad... yet.
# Back to A Little Experiment
While I was busying myself with the above detours, I kept thinking about ways
to optimize the earlier `vnt()` function. What if, instead of trying to
convince the planner that those unused JOINs didn't return any *rows*, I could
convince it that I didn't care about the join by not referencing any of its
*columns*, instead? Turns out that works, if the conditions are right. One of
those conditions is that the ON filter of the JOIN must exactly match a unique
index (or primary key) of the joined table, which is `(id,lang)` in our case.
Adding any more filters causes the optimization to fail, so part of the title
selection logic had to move to the SELECT part of the query. Apparently the
join filter may not be NULL, either.
With that trick applied, I also implemented proper support for selecting titles
that must match the original language and implemented the original language as
a special-case so that the same JOIN can be used for both the main and
alternative title. The end result isn't any more elegant:
```sql
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION vnt(p langprefs) RETURNS SETOF vnt_type AS $$
SELECT v.*
-- The language selection logic below is specially written so that the planner can remove references to joined tables corresponding to NULL languages.
, COALESCE(
CASE WHEN p.t1_lang IS NULL OR (p.t1_official AND NOT t1.official) OR (p.t1_official IS NULL AND t1.lang <> v.olang) THEN NULL ELSE COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.t1_latin THEN t1.latin ELSE NULL END, t1.title) END,
CASE WHEN p.t2_lang IS NULL OR (p.t2_official AND NOT t2.official) OR (p.t2_official IS NULL AND t2.lang <> v.olang) THEN NULL ELSE COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.t2_latin THEN t2.latin ELSE NULL END, t2.title) END,
CASE WHEN p.t3_lang IS NULL OR (p.t3_official AND NOT t3.official) OR (p.t3_official IS NULL AND t3.lang <> v.olang) THEN NULL ELSE COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.t3_latin THEN t3.latin ELSE NULL END, t3.title) END,
CASE WHEN p.t4_lang IS NULL OR (p.t4_official AND NOT t4.official) OR (p.t4_official IS NULL AND t4.lang <> v.olang) THEN NULL ELSE COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.t4_latin THEN t4.latin ELSE NULL END, t4.title) END,
CASE WHEN p IS NULL OR p.to_latin THEN ol.latin ELSE NULL END, ol.title
) AS title
, COALESCE(
CASE WHEN p.a1_lang IS NULL OR (p.a1_official AND NOT a1.official) OR (p.a1_official IS NULL AND a1.lang <> v.olang) THEN NULL ELSE COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.a1_latin THEN a1.latin ELSE NULL END, a1.title) END,
CASE WHEN p.a2_lang IS NULL OR (p.a2_official AND NOT a2.official) OR (p.a2_official IS NULL AND a2.lang <> v.olang) THEN NULL ELSE COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.a2_latin THEN a2.latin ELSE NULL END, a2.title) END,
CASE WHEN p.a3_lang IS NULL OR (p.a3_official AND NOT a3.official) OR (p.a3_official IS NULL AND a3.lang <> v.olang) THEN NULL ELSE COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.a3_latin THEN a3.latin ELSE NULL END, a3.title) END,
CASE WHEN p.a4_lang IS NULL OR (p.a4_official AND NOT a4.official) OR (p.a4_official IS NULL AND a4.lang <> v.olang) THEN NULL ELSE COALESCE(CASE WHEN p.a4_latin THEN a4.latin ELSE NULL END, a4.title) END,
CASE WHEN p.ao_latin THEN ol.latin ELSE NULL END, ol.title
) AS alttitle
FROM vn v
JOIN vn_titles ol ON ol.id = v.id AND ol.lang = v.olang
-- The COALESCE() below is kind of meaningless, but apparently the query planner can't optimize out JOINs with NULL conditions.
LEFT JOIN vn_titles t1 ON t1.id = v.id AND t1.lang = COALESCE(p.t1_lang, 'en')
LEFT JOIN vn_titles t2 ON t2.id = v.id AND t2.lang = COALESCE(p.t2_lang, 'en')
LEFT JOIN vn_titles t3 ON t3.id = v.id AND t3.lang = COALESCE(p.t3_lang, 'en')
LEFT JOIN vn_titles t4 ON t4.id = v.id AND t4.lang = COALESCE(p.t4_lang, 'en')
LEFT JOIN vn_titles a1 ON a1.id = v.id AND a1.lang = COALESCE(p.a1_lang, 'en')
LEFT JOIN vn_titles a2 ON a2.id = v.id AND a2.lang = COALESCE(p.a2_lang, 'en')
LEFT JOIN vn_titles a3 ON a3.id = v.id AND a3.lang = COALESCE(p.a3_lang, 'en')
LEFT JOIN vn_titles a4 ON a4.id = v.id AND a4.lang = COALESCE(p.a4_lang, 'en')
$$ LANGUAGE SQL STABLE;
```
Let's try the sort-by-title benchmark again:
```
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Limit (cost=8513.65..8513.90 rows=100 width=68) (actual time=39.216..39.226 rows=100 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=8513.65..8611.64 rows=39196 width=68) (actual time=39.216..39.220 rows=100 loops=1)
Sort Key: (COALESCE(CASE WHEN (((NOT t1.official) AND NULL::boolean) OR (t1.lang <> v.olang)) THEN NULL::text ELSE COALESCE(t1.title) END, ol.latin, ol.title))
Sort Method: top-N heapsort Memory: 43kB
-> Hash Join (cost=2870.99..7015.61 rows=39196 width=68) (actual time=12.583..32.991 rows=39128 loops=1)
Hash Cond: ((v.id = ol.id) AND (v.olang = ol.lang))
-> Hash Left Join (cost=1225.19..5066.04 rows=39196 width=44) (actual time=3.841..16.826 rows=39128 loops=1)
Hash Cond: (v.id = t1.id)
-> Seq Scan on vn v (cost=0.00..3737.95 rows=39196 width=8) (actual time=0.002..8.535 rows=39128 loops=1)
Filter: (NOT hidden)
Rows Removed by Filter: 1667
-> Hash (cost=1081.40..1081.40 rows=11503 width=40) (actual time=3.833..3.834 rows=11535 loops=1)
Buckets: 16384 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 873kB
-> Seq Scan on vn_titles t1 (cost=0.00..1081.40 rows=11503 width=40) (actual time=0.001..2.622 rows=11535 loops=1)
Filter: (lang = 'en'::language)
Rows Removed by Filter: 33617
-> Hash (cost=968.52..968.52 rows=45152 width=71) (actual time=8.731..8.732 rows=45152 loops=1)
Buckets: 65536 Batches: 1 Memory Usage: 4665kB
-> Seq Scan on vn_titles ol (cost=0.00..968.52 rows=45152 width=71) (actual time=0.003..3.744 rows=45152 loops=1)
Planning Time: 0.545 ms
Execution Time: 39.252 ms
```
Hey, that's the exact same query plan that we got with the original `vnt` view!
SUCCESS! \\o/
# A Failed Little Experiment?
...or so I thought. But then I went ahead an implemented that function to a few
parts of the site and quickly ran into queries that ran quite a bit slower than
they used to. Turns out the query planner gives up on finding the most optimal
plan pretty soon once the queries start getting slightly more complex. Taking,
for example, the query to fetch the 4 random screenshots on the homepage:
```sql
SELECT i.id, i.width, i.height, i.id AS vid, v.title
FROM (SELECT id, width, height FROM images i TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM (0.93)
WHERE i.c_weight > 0
AND vndbid_type(i.id) = 'sf'
AND i.c_sexual_avg < 40
AND i.c_violence_avg < 40
ORDER BY random()
LIMIT 4) i(id)
JOIN vn_screenshots vs ON vs.scr = i.id
JOIN vnt('(en,,,,,,,,f,f,f,f,t,f,f,f,f,f,,,,,f,f,f,f)'::langprefs) v ON v.id = vs.id
WHERE NOT v.hidden
ORDER BY random() LIMIT 4;
```
A fairly staightforward query. Using the `vnt` view it runs in about 5ms, with
the wonderfully optimized `vnt()` function above, 37ms. The planner completely
misses an important optimization. While I'm sure I could find other workarounds
for that particular query, I found several similar cases in just a short time.
Apart from the work involved in revisiting all queries used by the site, the
workarounds necessary to re-optimize them again are going to be fairly ugly.
Increasing
[join\_collapse\_limit](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/runtime-config-query.html#GUC-JOIN-COLLAPSE-LIMIT)
and
[from\_collapse\_limit](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/15/runtime-config-query.html#GUC-FROM-COLLAPSE-LIMIT)
appears to work, but I have queries that may have 3 or 4 `vnt()` calls and
optimizing those requires bumping the limit by a factor 4 or 5. I'm worried
about the impact of doing that site-wide, will have to do some more experiments
for that.
This little experiment may not have been the biggest success, but there's still
promise.
(Either way I got a [full script](/download/code/vntitles3.sql) for this
one, too)
# The Cliffhanger
And that's when I decided that I wasn't going to make much progress and I might
as well spend some time writing an article about it. There's still a bunch of
other ideas worth exploring:
- I could keep `vnt()` around for the few special cases where I *need* title
selection to be done entirely in SQL, while falling back to
application-generated subqueries for the more common case that I don't.
Downside: I need to maintain multiple different implementations of the same
thing.
- The simpler option: get rid of the `vn_titles` table and instead denormalize
the list of titles to a single column in the `vn` table. That should greatly
simplify implementing title selection and has the potential to be faster than
the current `vnt` view approach. Downside: I don't like it.
*2023-01-31 update: I ran some experiments and it turns out that this
approach is not actually faster than the `vnt` view.*
- There's always the madness option of trying SupportRequestSimplify.
If you have any better ideas, I'd love to hear them as well.
# The Conclusion
I wonder how other sites deal with features like this, other than "we don't"
and "we do but you can only select a single language option". Perhaps I just
want too much.
And it's always fun when people request simple-sounding features ("Hey can you
implement language preferences? Super simple! kthnx") and you end up in a
wonderfully deep rabbit hole. I haven't even fully explored this particular
hole yet.
For now, though, I'll be off exploring other ideas again. I'd like to end with
"To be continued...", but I'm lazy when it comes to writing so there may not be
a followup.